Sarah Ferguson was given the ‘Freedom of the City of York’ after visiting with her new husband – then Prince Andrew – in 1987 but a vote tonight has seen the honour taken away
Sarah Ferguson, the former Duchess of York, has been stripped of her “Freedom of the City of York” honour after a unanimous vote.
An extraordinary meeting was held in the historic city to decide if they were to remove the honorary freedom status, gifted to her in 1987 during a visit. ‘Fergie’ was a new bride when she was honoured by the city after the nation celebrated her marriage to the then Prince Andrew.
In 2022 the council decided to strip her ex-husband of the same honour, which was previously awarded to Winston Churchill and Judi Dench.
Last October Mr Mountbatten-Windsor was stripped of all his royal titles following further revelations and photos highlighting his links with Epstein. His wife also stopped using her title of ‘Duchess of York’ following Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s surrender of his royal titles due to the scandal. Mr Mountbatten-Windsor has vigorously denied any wrongdoing.
READ MORE: Sarah Ferguson charity suffers major blow amid Epstein scandal falloutREAD MORE: ‘I went to meet Sarah Ferguson but what Princess Beatrice did stunned me’
Speaking during the debate, Liberal Democrat councillor Darryl Smalley said: “We now know, following the release of thousands of documents, that Sarah Ferguson too had a close friendship with Epstein, which continued well beyond his conviction.
“We don’t expect recipients of York’s highest honour to be saints. We simply do not want them to be best friends of convicted paedophiles.
“We stand with victims. We stand for the rule of the rule of law. We stand for decency.”
Gwen Swinburn, a member of the public, addressed councillors during the debate. She said: “The decision before you tonight is whether to remove the freedom of the city from Ms Ferguson.
“It should not be a difficult one. It is the absolute minimum you should be doing.”
Councillor Claire Douglas, leader of the Labour group on the local authority, added: “As the people of York would expect, holding this status requires upholding the values and behaviours consistent with such an honour.
“Those who continued to associate with Jeffrey Epstein after his crimes became widely known fall well short of these expectations.
“Sarah Ferguson falls into this category as the Epstein files have shown. I therefore call on council to support the motion as presented.”
Fergie had been allowed to use the title after the couple divorced in 1996 divorce, but now she uses her maiden name, Sarah Ferguson.
Councillor Claire Douglas, City of York Council’s Labour leader, said last October it was deplorable that anyone bearing titles linked to the city had associated with Epstein after his crimes became known. The vote is due to be held on Thursday evening.
Leader of City of York Council, Cllr Claire Douglas said: “Honorary Freedom is bestowed only on persons of distinction and those having given eminent services to the City of York.
“As the people of York would expect, holding this status requires upholding the values and behaviours consistent with such an honour. Those who continued to associate with Epstein after his crimes became widely known fall well short of these expectations.
“City of York councillors considered these issues this evening and agreed that removing the honour from Sarah Ferguson was appropriate. This was the right decision to take to maintain the integrity and standing of this important York honour.”
This latest humiliation follows mounting pressure on Sarah Ferguson because of her past links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who she once described as the ‘brother I always wished for’.
Anger further erupted after a 2011 email from Ferguson to Epstein surfaced, where she referred to him as a “steadfast,” “generous,” and “supreme friend” to her and her family, despite his earlier conviction.
A spokesperson for the former duchess, now aged 66, said the email was sent in response to legal threats from Epstein after her comments that her involvement with him was a ‘gigantic error of judgment’.
The controversy led to multiple charities dropping her as a patron or ambassador in late 2025. There have been claims that Ms Ferguson is considering a tell-all TV chat but there are mounting calls for her to give evidence concerning her links to Jeffrey Epstein.
US lawmakers have repeatedly called for her former husband, who has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office in February, to answer questions about his links to the late American financier and sex offender. Now Ferguson is being urged to do the same.
Congressman Suhas Subramanyam, a member of the House Oversight Committee investigating the handling of Epstein’s prosecution, said he now believed she had “information related to the investigation”.
“Sarah Ferguson should give sworn testimony to our committee,” he said. There is no legal mechanism to compel Ferguson to testify in the US. But Subramanyam told the BBC that lawmakers would be “happy to work out terms that work for her”, as long as she was under oath.
The family of prominent Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre also said they “strongly believed” the former Duchess of York should go to the US to answer questions.
“If Ferguson knows anything, she should testify in the United States immediately,” a representative for Giuffre’s brother Sky Roberts told the BBC.
