Delhi HC Seeks Centre’s Stance on Regulating Addictive Social Media Design

The Delhi High Court has directed the Union government to clarify its position on the potential regulation of “addictive” design features integrated into popular social media platforms. The court’s inquiry follows a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that raises serious concerns regarding the psychological impact of engagement-maximizing mechanisms such as infinite scrolling, autoplay functions, and personalized recommendation feeds.

During Wednesday’s proceedings, a bench headed by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan pressed the Centre for its stance on whether the government intends to formulate a policy framework to address the architecture of social media sites that are purportedly designed to cultivate user dependency.

The Core of the Legal Challenge

The PIL, filed by petitioner Vikas Kathuria, seeks the formation of an expert committee tasked with conducting an in-depth examination of the digital infrastructure of these platforms. Unlike traditional grievances that focus on content regulation, this petition targets the technical framework of the applications themselves.

Kathuria’s plea argues that the addictive nature of social media is not accidental but a byproduct of specific design choices. He specifically identified features such as notification systems, “like” buttons, and the relentless stream of content delivered via autoplay and infinite scroll as instruments that exploit behavioral psychology to keep users tethered to their screens for extended periods. The petitioner contends that these design elements are engineered to prioritize user engagement over user well-being, raising questions about digital safety and consumer protection.

Government and Industry Response

When asked if the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology or other relevant government bodies had initiated any policy discussions regarding the regulation of these design features, Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma informed the court that he lacked specific instructions on the matter at this time.

The court granted the government three weeks to seek instructions and return with a definitive response. In the interim, the proceedings saw resistance from both the central government counsel and representatives for certain social media giants. These parties challenged the maintainability of the PIL, pointing to previous orders from the Supreme Court and other High Courts that had declined to intervene in similar matters involving the regulation of platform design.

The Path Forward

The judicial scrutiny of social media architecture reflects a growing global trend in recognizing the impact of “dark patterns” and engagement-maximizing algorithms on mental health, particularly among younger users. While platforms have historically defended their interfaces as tools for user experience and personalization, the petition serves as a formal challenge to the ethics of these systems.

By seeking a response from the Centre, the Delhi High Court has signaled that the debate over digital addiction is moving beyond abstract concerns into the realm of legal and policy considerations. Whether the government will opt to develop a dedicated regulatory framework or maintain its reliance on existing digital laws remains to be seen. The court has scheduled the matter for further hearing in three weeks, by which time the Union is expected to present a clearer perspective on whether it views these “engagement-maximizing” features as a subject for legislative oversight.

Disclaimer: This content is auto-generated for informational purposes only.

Source: Read Original News