A disaster risk and resilience analysis framework provides insights for modelling natural hazard-induced human mobility


  • Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2021–the Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Cambridge University Press, 2023).

  • Clement, V. et al. Groundswell Part 2 (World Bank, 2021).

  • Internal Displacement Monitoring Center (IDMC). 2024 Global Report on Internal Displacement (GRID). https://doi.org/10.55363/IDMC.DAKY2849 (2024).

  • Adger, W. N. et al. Focus on environmental risks and migration: causes and consequences. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 060201 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bettini, G. Where Next? Climate change, migration, and the (bio)politics of adaptation. Glob. Policy 8, 33–39 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Black, R., Arnell, N. W., Adger, W. N., Thomas, D. & Geddes, A. Migration, immobility and displacement outcomes following extreme events. Environ. Sci. Policy 27, S32–S43 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Felli, R. Managing climate insecurity by ensuring continuous capital accumulation: ‘climate refugees’ and ‘climate migrants. N. Political Econ. 18, 337–363 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Black, R. et al. The effect of environmental change on human migration. Glob. Environ. Change 21, S3–S11 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Castelli, F. Drivers of migration: Why do people move? J.Travel Med. 25, tay040 (2018).

  • Hauer, M. E. et al. Sea-level rise and human migration. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 28–39 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Parrish, R. et al. A critical analysis of the drivers of human migration patterns in the presence of climate change: a new conceptual model. IJERPH 17, 6036 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Black, R., Bennett, S. R. G., Thomas, S. M. & Beddington, J. R. Migration as adaptation. Nature 478, 447–449 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jha, C. K., Gupta, V., Chattopadhyay, U. & Amarayil Sreeraman, B. Migration as adaptation strategy to cope with climate change: a study of farmers’ migration in rural India. IJCCSM 10, 121–141 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaczan, D. J. & Orgill-Meyer, J. The impact of climate change on migration: a synthesis of recent empirical insights. Clim. Change 158, 281–300 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McLeman, R. & Smit, B. Migration as an adaptation to climate change. Clim. Change 76, 31–53 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Benveniste, H., Oppenheimer, M. & Fleurbaey, M. Climate change increases resource-constrained international immobility. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 634–641 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Letta, M., Montalbano, P. & Paolantonio, A. Climate Immobility Traps: a Household-Level Test (World Bank, 2024).

  • de Haas, H. A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework. CMS 9, 8 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Sherbinin, A. et al. Migration theory in climate mobility research. Front. Clim. 4, 882343 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, M. & Caldeira, K. Climate change as an incentive for future human migration. Earth Syst. Dynam. 11, 875–883 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • De Lellis, P., Ruiz Marín, M. & Porfiri, M. Modeling human migration under environmental change: a case study of the effect of sea level rise in Bangladesh. Earth’s. Future 9, e2020EF001931 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kam, P. M. et al. Impact-based forecasting of tropical cyclone-related human displacement to support anticipatory action. Nat. Commun. 15, 8795 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Meiler, S. et al. A natural hazard risk modelling approach to human displacement – frontiers & challenges. Environ. Res.: Clim. 4, 045001 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schwaller, N. L., El-Khattabi, A. R. & Nguyen, M. T. Networks Matter: Examining migration networks using cellphone data following Hurricane Maria. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 100, 104139 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smirnov, O., Lahav, G., Orbell, J., Zhang, M. & Xiao, T. Climate change, drought, and potential environmental migration flows under different policy scenarios. Int. Migr. Rev. 57, 36–67 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Costa, R., Haukaas, T. & Chang, S. E. Predicting population displacements after earthquakes. Sustain. Resilient Infrastruct. 7, 253–271 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tanaka, T., Koga, A. & Yokomatsu, M. Agent-based intra-regional relocation model considering spatial local amenity for urban planning-based flood risk management: assessing the impact of urban development on flood exposure. J. Flood Risk Manag. 17, e13035 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tierolf, L. et al. A coupled agent-based model for France for simulating adaptation and migration decisions under future coastal flood risk. Sci. Rep. 13, 4176 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bell, A. R. et al. Migration towards Bangladesh coastlines projected to increase with sea-level rise through 2100. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 024045 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Entwisle, B., Verdery, A. & Williams, N. Climate change and migration: new insights from a dynamic model of out-migration and return migration. Am. J. Sociol. 125, 1469–1512 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oliveira, J. & Pereda, P. The impact of climate change on internal migration in Brazil. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 103, 102340 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dembedza, V. P., Chopera, P., Mapara, J. & Macheka, L. Impact of climate change-induced natural disasters on intangible cultural heritage related to food: a review. J. Ethn. Food 9, 32 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaniasty, K. Social support, interpersonal, and community dynamics following disasters caused by natural hazards. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 32, 105–109 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leviston, Z., Dandy, J., Horwitz, P. & Drake, D. Anticipating environmental losses: effects on place attachment and intentions to move. J. Migr. Health 7, 100152 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beyer, R. M., Schewe, J. & Abel, G. J. Modeling climate migration: dead ends and new avenues. Front. Clim. 5, 1212649 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ward, P. J. et al. Review article: natural hazard risk assessments at the global scale. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 1069–1096 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cremen, G. et al. A state-of-the-art decision-support environment for risk-sensitive and pro-poor urban planning and design in Tomorrow’s cities. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 85, 103400 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Galasso, C. et al. Editorial. Risk-based, Pro-poor Urban Design and Planning for Tomorrow’s Cities. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 58, 102158 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Paul, N., Galasso, C. & Baker, J. Household displacement and return in disasters: a review. Nat. Hazards Rev. 25, 03123006 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soden, R. et al. The importance of accounting for equity in disaster risk models. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 386 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Markhvida, M., Walsh, B., Hallegatte, S. & Baker, J. Quantification of disaster impacts through household well-being losses. Nat. Sustain. 3, 538–547 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Verschuur, J., Koks, E. E., Haque, A. & Hall, J. W. Prioritising resilience policies to reduce welfare losses from natural disasters: a case study for coastal Bangladesh. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102179 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Murphy, C. & Gardoni, P. The role of society in engineering risk analysis: a capabilities-based approach. Risk Anal. 26, 1073–1083 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tseng, T.-H. & Stojadinović, B. CI-STR: a capabilities-based interface to model socio-technical systems in disaster resilience assessment. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 111, 104763 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carling, J. Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 28, 5–42 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • de Haas, H. Migration and development: a theoretical perspective. Int. Migr. Rev. 44, 227–264 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Massey, D. S. et al. Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. Popul. Dev. Rev. 19, 431 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hugo, G. Future demographic change and its interactions with migration and climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 21, S21–S33 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McLeman, R. et al. Conceptual framing to link climate risk assessments and climate-migration scholarship. Clim. Change 165, 24 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2023).

  • Glossary on Migration. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iml_34_glossary.pdf (2019).

  • McNamara, K. E., Olson, L. L. & Rahman, M.dA. Insecure hope: the challenges faced by urban slum dwellers in Bhola Slum, Bangladesh. Migr. Dev. 5, 1–15 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Uddin, M. J. Climate Change, Vulnerabilities, and Migration: Insights from Ecological Migrants in Bangladesh. J. Environ. Dev. 33, 50–74 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Karutz, R. & Kabisch, S. Exploring the relationship between droughts and rural-to-urban mobility—a mixed methods approach for Pune, India. Front. Clim. 5, 1168584 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Latai-Niusulu, A., Tsujita, M. & Neef, A. Climate micro-mobilities as adaptation practice in the Pacific: the case of Samoa. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 378, 20220392 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zickgraf, C. Relational (im)mobilities: a case study of Senegalese coastal fishing populations. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 48, 3450–3467 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koutchoro, A. M. et al. Pastoral transitions in West Africa: analysis of factors influencing herders’ sedentarization in northern Benin. Pastoralism 15, 15199 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tubi, A. & Israeli, Y. Is climate migration successful adaptation or maladaptation? A holistic assessment of outcomes in Kenya. Clim. Risk Manag. 44, 100614 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, Y., Zhang, Y. & Chen, J. Migration under economic transition and changing climate in Mongolia. J. Arid Environ. 185, 104333 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Groen, J. A. & Polivka, A. E. Going home after Hurricane Katrina: determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography 47, 821–844 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Murakami, M., Takebayashi, Y., Ono, K., Kubota, A. & Tsubokura, M. The decision to return home and wellbeing after the Fukushima disaster. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 47, 101538 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cuaton, G. P., See, J. & Webster, S. Climate-related planned relocation as domicide: the multi-dimensional destruction of home in the Philippines. Habitat Int. 169, 103710 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bronen, R. & Chapin, F. S. Adaptive governance and institutional strategies for climate-induced community relocations in Alaska. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 9320–9325 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Link, A.-C., Piggott-McKellar, A., Nakoro, E. & Oakes, R. Climate-related partial relocation in Fiji impacts the wellbeing of those who relocated and those who stayed differently. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 394 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nichols, A. Climate change, natural hazards, and relocation: insights from Nabukadra and Navuniivi villages in Fiji. Clim. Change 156, 255–271 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Government of Pakistan. Pakistan Floods 2022: Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA). https://www.undp.org/pakistan/publications/pakistan-floods-2022-post-disaster-needs-assessment-pdna (2022).

  • Wolde, S. G., D’Odorico, P. & Rulli, M. C. More than three-quarters of environmental migration in Somalia is driven by water deficiency for food and livestock production. Nat. Food 7, 100–111 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blondin, S. Understanding involuntary immobility in the Bartang Valley of Tajikistan through the prism of motility. Mobilities 15, 543–558 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Praag, L. Can I move or can I stay? Applying a life course perspective on immobility when facing gradual environmental changes in Morocco. Clim. Risk Manag. 31, 100274 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Freihardt, J. Trapped by climate change? (In)voluntary immobility in Bangladesh. Reg. Environ. Change 25, 117 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rafa, N. Moving on the edge: climate change-induced hazards and the politics of (im)mobility in Rohingya refugee camps. Clim. Dev. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2025.2609772 (2026).

  • Oxford University Press. well-being, n. Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 2023).

  • Sen, A. Development as Freedom (Oxford University Press, 2001).

  • Nussbaum, M. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Econ. 9, 33–59 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maslow, A. H. A theory of human motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50, 370–396 (1943).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clark, S. S., Seager, T. P. & Chester, M. V. A capabilities approach to the prioritization of critical infrastructure. Environ. Syst. Decis. 38, 339–352 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hofstede, G. The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9, 389 (1984).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wahba, M. A. & Bridwell, L. G. Maslow reconsidered: a review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 15, 212–240 (1976).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A. & Fitoussi, J.-P. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf (2009).

  • Voukelatou, V. et al. Measuring objective and subjective well-being: dimensions and data sources. Int J. Data Sci. Anal. 11, 279–309 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Western, M. & Tomaszewski, W. Subjective wellbeing, objective wellbeing and inequality in Australia. PLoS ONE 11, e0163345 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • European Social Survey. Dimensions of Wellbeing. https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/findings/europeans-wellbeing/dimensions-wellbeing (2026).

  • University of Waterloo. Domains and indicators. Canadian Index of Wellbeing. https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-index-wellbeing/what-we-do/domains-and-indicators (2026).

  • OECD. OECD Well-being Data Monitor. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/tools/well-being-data-monitor.html (2026).

  • Morshedi, M., Hastak, M., Ukkusuri, S. V. & Lee, S. Quantifying post-disaster community well-being: a case study of Hurricane Harvey. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 114, 104903 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Office for National Statistics. UK Measures of National Well-Being Framework User Guide. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/methodologies/ukmeasuresofnationalwellbeinguserguide (2026).

  • Robeyns, I. The capability approach: a theoretical survey. J. Hum. Dev. 6, 93–117 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bourdieu, P. The Forms of Capital. in Readings in Economic Sociology (ed Biggart, N. W.) 280–291 (Wiley, 2002).

  • Wang, C. et al. A Bespoke approach to facilitating disaster impact quantification using locally relevant metrics. Nat. Hazards Rev. 27, 04026002 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Claridge, T. Functions of Social Capital – Bonding, Bridging, Linking. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7993853 (2018).

  • Putnam, R. D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. (Simon & Schuster [u.a.], 2001).

  • Graham, J. P., Hirai, M. & Kim, S.-S. An analysis of water collection labor among women and children in 24 sub-Saharan African countries. PLoS ONE 11, e0155981 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lambon-Quayefio, M. P. Walking for water and fuelwood: welfare implications for women and children in Ghana. J. Int. Dev. 36, 365–397 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Helmke, G. & Levitsky, S. Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research Agenda. Persp Pol. 2, 725–740 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alencar, A. Mobile communication and refugees: an analytical review of academic literature. Sociol. Compass 14, e12802 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). Sendai Framework Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/drr-glossary/terminology (2023).

  • Bruneau, M. et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq. Spectra 19, 733–752 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Béné, C. Towards a quantifiable measure of resilience. IDS Working Pap. 2013, 1–27 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Béné, C., Wood, R. G., Newsham, A. & Davies, M. Resilience: New Utopia or New Tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes. IDS Work. Pap. 2012, 1–61 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tierney, K. & Bruneau, M. Conceptualizing and Measuring Resilience. 14–17 (2007).

  • Thalheimer, L. et al. Prioritizing involuntary immobility in climate policy and disaster planning. Nat. Commun. 16, 2581 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vaidya, O. S. & Kumar, S. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169, 1–29 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Potoglou, D. et al. Best–worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data. Soc. Sci. Med. 72, 1717–1727 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Office for National Statistics. Key Workers Reference Tables. https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/datasets/keyworkersreferencetables/current (2020).

  • Ruggles, S. et al. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 7.7. https://doi.org/10.18128/D020.V7.7 (IPUMS, 2025).

  • World Bank Jobs Group. Global Labor Database (GitHub, 2026).

  • Ruggles, S., King, M. L., Levison, D., McCaa, R. & Sobek, M. IPUMS-International. Hist. Methods. J. Quant. Interdiscip. Hist. 36, 60–65 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Menteşe, E. Y. et al. Future exposure modelling for risk-informed decision making in urban planning. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 90, 103651 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deaton, A. The Analysis of Household Surveys (Reissue Edition with a New Preface): A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy (World Bank, 2019).

  • Meyer, B. & Sullivan, J. Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption. w9760. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9760.pdf (2003) https://doi.org/10.3386/w9760.

  • Moghfeli, Z. et al. Social capital and farmers’ leadership in Iranian rural communities: application of social network analysis. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 66, 977–1001 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Saint Ville, A. S., Hickey, G. M., Locher, U. & Phillip, L. E. Exploring the role of social capital in influencing knowledge flows and innovation in smallholder farming communities in the Caribbean. Food Section 8, 535–549 (2016).

  • Balboni, G., Menardo, E. & Cubelli, R. Development and validation of the Scale of Cultural Capital. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 149–175. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM26.1.8 (2019).

  • Kraaykamp, G. & Van Eijck, K. The intergenerational reproduction of cultural capital: a threefold perspective. Soc. Forces 89, 209–231 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sieben, S. & Lechner, C. M. Measuring cultural capital through the number of books in the household. Meas. Instrum. Soc. Sci. 1, 1 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sullivan, A. Cultural capital and educational attainment. Sociology 35, 893–912 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Filmer, D. & Scott, K. Assessing asset indices. Demography 49, 359–392 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Davila, R. L. et al. Water, walls, and bicycles: wealth index composition using census microdata. J. Dem. Econ. 88, 79–120 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Varghese, J. S., Maluccio, J. A., Cunningham, S. A., Ramirez-Zea, M. & Stein, A. D. Development of a temporally harmonized asset index: evidence from across 50 years of follow up of a birth cohort in Guatemala. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 21, 85 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kyne, D. & Aldrich, D. P. Capturing bonding, bridging, and linking social capital through publicly available data. Risk Hazard Crisis Pub Pol. 11, 61–86 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cabrera, J. F. & Najarian, J. C. How the built environment shapes spatial bridging ties and social capital. Environ. Behav. 47, 239–267 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraser, T., Awadalla, O., Sarup, H. & Aldrich, D. P. A tale of many cities: mapping social infrastructure and social capital across the United States. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 114, 102195 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mazumdar, S., Learnihan, V., Cochrane, T. & Davey, R. The built environment and social capital: a systematic review. Environ. Behav. 50, 119–158 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, S. A. & Hipp, J. R. How great and how good?: Third places, neighbor interaction, and cohesion in the neighborhood context. Soc. Sci. Res. 77, 68–78 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brandano, M. G., Conti, C., Modica, M. & Urso, G. Mapping cultural heritage sites at risk: a support tool for heritage sites management. J. Urban Manag. 14, 690–699 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Backman, M. & Nilsson, P. The role of cultural heritage in attracting skilled individuals. J. Cult. Econ. 42, 111–138 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gentile, R. et al. Scoring, selecting, and developing physical impact models for multi-hazard risk assessment. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 82, 103365 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Natural Capital Alliance. Habitat Risk Assessment. InVEST. http://releases.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest-userguide/latest/en/habitat_risk_assessment.html.

  • Ceferino, L., Kiremidjian, A. & Deierlein, G. Probabilistic Model for Regional Multiseverity Casualty Estimation due to Building Damage Following an Earthquake. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng. 4, 04018023 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jaiswal, K. S. & Wald, D. J. Development of a semi-empirical loss model within the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) System. in Proc. 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering (CAEE, 2010).

  • Jonkman, S. N., Vrijling, J. K. & Vrouwenvelder, A. C. W. M. Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods: a literature review and a proposal for a new method. Nat. Hazards 46, 353–389 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • FEMA. Hazus 6.1 Earthquake Model Techincal Manual. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_hazus-earthquake-model-technical-manual-6-1.pdf (2024).

  • Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M. & Bruneau, M. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng. Struct. 32, 3639–3649 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dueñas-Osorio, L., Craig, J. I., Goodno, B. J. & Bostrom, A. Interdependent Response of Networked Systems. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 13, 185–194 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kalungi, P. & Tanyimboh, T. T. Redundancy model for water distribution systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 82, 275–286 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, Y. & Chen, S. Resilience modeling and pre-hazard mitigation planning of transportation network to support post-earthquake emergency medical response. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 230, 108918 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, X., Chen, A., Jansuwan, S., Yang, C. & Ryu, S. Transportation network redundancy: complementary measures and computational methods. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 114, 68–85 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M. & Joye, D. Motility: mobility as capital. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 28, 745–756 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moret, J. Mobility: A practice or a Capital? in European Somalis’ Post-Migration Movements, 99–138 (Springer International Publishing, 2018).

  • Almaden, C. R. Deliberative preferences for collective adaptation: evidence from the Philippines and Viet Nam. J. Inst. Econ. 22, e1 (2026).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Comelli, T. et al. Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation. Build. Cities 5, 83–100 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Skidmore, T. A. & Cohon, J. L. A multicriteria decision analysis framework for developing and evaluating coastal retreat policy. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 19, 83–98 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Alis, C., Legara, E. F. & Monterola, C. Generalized radiation model for human migration. Sci. Rep. 11, 22707 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Simini, F., González, M. C., Maritan, A. & Barabási, A.-L. A universal model for mobility and migration patterns. Nature 484, 96–100 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klabunde, A. & Willekens, F. Decision-making in agent-based models of migration: state of the art and challenges. Eur. J. Popul. 32, 73–97 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mannakkara, S. & Wilkinson, S. Re-conceptualising “Building Back Better” to improve post-disaster recovery. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 7, 327–341 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McClain, S. N. et al. Migration with dignity: a legal and policy framework. JDR 17, 292–300 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dayley, R. Imagined Communities in Thailand: ethnographic approaches. J. Church State 51, 356–358 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Howard, S. Coffee and the state in rural Ethiopia. Anthropol. Matters 18, 83–104 (2018).

  • Hyler, S. Invisible lines crossing the city: ethnographic strategies for place-making. Cult. Unbound 5, 361–384 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mikkonen, E. Bridges over the Mountain Ranges: Ethnography on the Complexities of Transition in Women’s Social Position in Nepalese Rural Communities (Lapin Yliopisto, 2017).

  • Mukil, M. V., Shinde, K., Rashed, T. & Bhavani, R. R. Religious-Cultural framework for sustaining environmental balance in rural ecosystems: stewardship of village-temples in Tamil Nadu, India. Local Environ. 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2026.2631508 (2026).

  • Thurnell-Read, T. If they weren’t in the Pub, they probably wouldn’t even know each other’: alcohol, sociability and pub based leisure. Int J. Socio. Leis. 4, 61–78 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cox, L. A. (Tony). Confronting deep uncertainties in risk analysis. Risk Anal. 32, 1607–1629 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Walker, W. E., Lempert, R. J. & Kwakkel, J. H. Deep uncertainty. in Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (eds Gass, S. I. & Fu, M. C.) 395–402 (Springer US, 2013).

  • Haklay, M. & Weber, P. OpenStreetMap: user-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Comput 7, 12–18 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • OpenStreetMap contributors. Planet Dump. Retrieved from. https://planet.osm.org (OpenStreetMap Foundation, 2026).

  • Oostwegel, L. J. N., Schorlemmer, D., Lingner, L. & Evaz Zadeh, T. OpenBuildingMap. https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.LKUT.2025.002 (GFZ Data Services, 2025).

  • Oostwegel, L. J. N., Schorlemmer, D. & Guéguen, P. From footprints to functions: a comprehensive global and semantic building footprint dataset. Sci. Data 12, 1699 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Microsoft. Global ML Building Footprints (GitHub, 2022).

  • Sirko, W. et al. Continental-scale building detection from high resolution satellite imagery. Preprint at. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2107.12283 (2021).

  • Google Research. Open Buildings (Google Research, 2023).

  • Meijer, J. R., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Schotten, K. C. G. J. & Schipper, A. M. Global Roads Inventory Project (GLOBIO, 2018).

  • Meijer, J. R., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Schotten, K. C. G. J. & Schipper, A. M. Global patterns of current and future road infrastructure. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064006 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • OpenCelliD contributors. OpenCelliD (Unwired Labs, 2026).

  • Tallis, H. & Polasky, S. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1162, 265–283 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Natural Capital Alliance. InVEST 3.19.0: integrated valuation of ecosystem services and tradeoffs. GitHub. https://doi.org/10.60793/NATCAP-INVEST-3.19.0 (2026).

  • Zanaga, D. et al. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2021 v200. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7254220 (2022).

  • Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L. & Joppa, L. N. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110, E2602–E2610 (2013).

  • Jenkins, C. N. Biodiversity Mapping. https://biodiversitymapping.org (2026).

  • Bondarenko, M. et al. Constrained estimates of 2015-2030 total number of people per grid square at a resolution of 3 arc (approximately 100m at the equator) R2025A version v1. https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/WP00839 (University of Southampton, 2025).

  • Tatem, A. J. WorldPop, open data for spatial demography. Sci. Data 4, 170004 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schiavina, M., Melchiorri, M. & Pesaresi, M. GHS-SMOD R2023A – GHS settlement layers, application of the Degree of Urbanisation methodology (stage I) to GHS-POP R2023A and GHS-BUILT-S R2023A, multitemporal (1975-2030). European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) https://doi.org/10.2905/A0DF7A6F-49DE-46EA-9BDE-563437A6E2BA (2023).

  • Pesaresi, M. et al. Advances on the Global Human Settlement Layer by joint assessment of Earth Observation and population survey data. Int. J. Digital Earth 17, 2390454 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *