A Royal Wootton Bassett woman has been fined after failing to comply with legal requirements to register her pet dog’s microchip details.
Victoria Hill, 35, of Queen’s Road, appeared before Swindon Magistrates’ Court on September 11, where she was prosecuted by Wiltshire Council. Hill did not attend the hearing, and magistrates found her guilty in her absence.
The court imposed a £220 fine and ordered Hill to pay £300 in costs, alongside an £88 victim surcharge, bringing her total financial penalty to £608.
The legal proceedings stem from an incident on March 5, when a Shih Tzu-type dog named Dolly was discovered wandering loose in The Rosary area of Royal Wootton Bassett. The dog was secured and taken to a local veterinary practice, where staff discovered that while the animal was fitted with a microchip, it had not been registered on any approved database. Furthermore, the dog was not wearing a collar or any form of identification tag, which is also a legal requirement.
Dolly was subsequently collected by Wiltshire Council’s Dog Warden Service and held in kennels. Two days later, Hill came forward to claim the dog, providing proof of ownership and paying the necessary release fees.
During the collection, council officers issued Hill with a formal notice requiring her to register the dog’s microchip details within 21 days, as mandated by the Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015. Despite extensive efforts by the council to secure her cooperation—which included a series of letters, emails, phone calls, and a direct visit to her home—the microchip details remained unregistered, leaving the council with no choice but to launch formal legal action.
Sarah Valdus, Director of Public Protection at Wiltshire Council, highlighted the critical importance of microchipping as a tool for animal welfare.
“Microchipping is one of the quickest and most effective ways of reuniting lost dogs with their owners,” Valdus said. “It is a legal requirement for dog keepers to ensure their pet’s microchip details are registered and kept up to date. Without accurate information, it can be difficult to identify and contact the owner of a lost dog.”
Addressing the decision to prosecute, Valdus added that the council always prefers engagement over enforcement.
“In this case, the dog owner was given multiple opportunities to comply with the law before enforcement action was taken,” she noted. “We will always seek to achieve compliance through advice and engagement wherever possible, but we will not hesitate to take appropriate action where statutory notices are ignored. It is a very simple task to register the details; it is not only the responsible and legal thing to do, but it saves a lot of time and effort from our officers.”
Disclaimer: This content is auto-generated for informational purposes only.
Source: Read Original News
