WASHINGTON D.C. – Representative Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has announced his formal opposition to a proposed $2.8 billion (£2.1 billion) arms sale to Israel, marking a significant escalation in the internal debate over American military support for the ongoing conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon.
At the center of the controversy is a planned transfer of 40,000 munitions, including 2,000lb (900kg) bombs. These weapons, manufactured by General Dynamics, are among the most destructive in the U.S. arsenal and have become a focal point of international condemnation due to their devastating impact when deployed in densely populated civilian areas.
“This deal raises grave, unresolved concerns about how these munitions could be used in densely populated areas of Gaza and Lebanon,” Meeks said in a statement. While emphasizing his continued commitment to Israel’s security, the New York congressman argued that Congress has a moral and legal “responsibility to ensure that US-funded weapons are used lawfully, responsibly, and with meaningful safeguards for human life.”
The proposed sale is part of the Foreign Military Financing program, which uses taxpayer dollars to provide allies with billions in U.S.-made weaponry. The Biden administration had previously paused shipments of these specific heavy bombs in 2024 amid civilian protection concerns, but President Donald Trump reversed that policy upon returning to office last year.
While Meeks’ opposition serves as a high-profile rebuke of the administration’s policy, his stance alone is not enough to kill the deal. Under current statutes, lawmakers can place an informal “hold” on arms sales exceeding a certain dollar threshold; however, the President maintains the authority to bypass Congress entirely by declaring an emergency that necessitates an immediate sale. To legally block the transfer, opponents would need to pass a veto-proof resolution, requiring a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate—a high hurdle in a legislature that remains historically supportive of Israel.
The backlash from progressive corners has been swift. J Street, a liberal pro-Israel advocacy group, weighed in on the prospect of the shipment, telling the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, “You cannot rebuild Gaza with 2,000lb bombs.”
The objection highlights a growing fracture within the Democratic Party. While the U.S.-Israel relationship still enjoys strong bipartisan backing, support is softening among Democrats. The divide was evident last July, when 103 Democrats joined Republican Thomas Massie in a failed attempt to cut $3.3 billion in security aid to Israel.
As of press time, the Israeli Embassy has not provided a comment regarding the congressman’s statement. The administration has yet to formally declare an emergency, leaving the status of the $2.8 billion package in a high-stakes legislative limbo.
Disclaimer: This content is auto-generated for informational purposes only.
Source: Read Original News
