Pakistan Raises Tensions at UN, Accuses India of Orchestrating “False Flag” Operations
In a recent session of the United Nations General Assembly’s First Committee, Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the UN Office in Geneva, Tahir Andrabi, leveled fresh accusations against New Delhi, alleging that India has formalised a policy of launching preemptive strikes against Pakistan. According to Andrabi, India is allegedly manufacturing pretexts to justify military incursions, a claim he described as a significant threat to regional stability.
Allegations of a “Doctrine of Force”
Addressing the committee, the Pakistani diplomat asserted that South Asia is currently being held hostage by a “doctrine of force.” Andrabi made pointed references to events he claimed occurred in May 2025, characterising them as unprovoked military aggression by Indian forces. He further claimed that Islamabad had delivered a “precise and effective” response to these actions, reinforcing his narrative that Pakistan maintains the capability and resolve to defend its sovereignty against any perceived external threat.
While Andrabi maintained that Pakistan does not wish to engage in an escalatory arms race, he emphasized that his country remains committed to a “full spectrum of deterrence.” This, he argued, is essential to maintain a credible minimum deterrence against what he termed as India’s aggressive regional posture.
Concerns Over Regional Militarization
The Pakistani representative went beyond current grievances to express concern over India’s ongoing military modernization efforts. Andrabi highlighted the rapid development of India’s strategic arsenal, specifically citing the advancement of intercontinental, maritime, and hypersonic systems. He argued that these developments complicate the security architecture of South Asia, particularly given the lack of formal communication channels between the two nuclear-armed neighbors.
Andrabi pointedly noted that the last formal dialogue focused on nuclear and conventional confidence-building measures (CBMs) between India and Pakistan took place over a decade ago, in 2012. He suggested that the absence of such diplomatic engagement creates a dangerous vacuum, particularly regarding the potential for miscalculation.
Calls for Dialogue vs. The Reality of Restraint
Despite the heightened rhetoric, the Pakistani envoy insisted that Islamabad prefers the path of diplomacy. He called for a substantive dialogue to address all outstanding issues, specifically reiterating Pakistan’s long-standing position on Jammu and Kashmir, which he insists should be settled in accordance with UN Security Council resolutions.
Andrabi also restated Pakistan’s proposal for a “strategic restraint regime,” an idea frequently floated by Islamabad to prevent military imbalances. During his address, he cautioned against the theory that a “limited conventional war” could be contained in a region where both nations possess nuclear weapons. He dismissed this notion as a “dangerous illusion,” warning that any military confrontation could rapidly spiral out of control.
While these accusations represent the latest chapter in the long-standing diplomatic friction between the two nations, they reflect a significant hardening of positions at international forums. As India continues to focus on its modernization and security objectives, Pakistan’s aggressive stance at the UN suggests that bilateral tensions are unlikely to see a reprieve in the near future, leaving the prospect of renewed high-level diplomatic talks in a state of deep uncertainty.
Disclaimer: This content is auto-generated for informational purposes only.
Source: Read Original News
