Kashmiri Pandit Activist Arrested in Cyberterrorism Probe
SRINAGAR: The Jammu and Kashmir Police have taken a prominent Kashmiri Pandit activist into custody following allegations of digital intimidation and the circulation of terror-related threats. Rakesh Handoo, a resident of Faridabad, Haryana, was apprehended by law enforcement officials on October 17, 2026, and subsequently remanded to five days in police custody by a court in the Sopore police district.
Handoo, a political figure who previously challenged National Conference president Farooq Abdullah in the 2008 Assembly elections from the Hazratbal constituency, finds himself at the center of a grave legal investigation involving charges of cyberterrorism.
Allegations and Investigation
The case against Handoo stems from a formal complaint filed on September 17, 2026, by a migrant Kashmiri employee currently working under the Prime Minister’s Rehabilitation Package. According to police, the accused allegedly manipulated digital content to spread fear within the community.
Investigators claim that Handoo repeatedly shared posts on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) that were purportedly issued by militant outfits such as “Soldier of Resistance” and “United Liberation Council.” Authorities allege that the accused did not merely share existing threats but actively altered the content, superimposing the names of specific Kashmiri Pandit employees onto the documents to falsely portray them as targets of terror groups.
“The accused failed to cooperate with the investigative process despite receiving three official notices to appear,” a senior police official stated. “This lack of compliance necessitated the issuance of an arrest warrant, which ultimately led to his apprehension.”
During the arrest, police seized two mobile phones from the accused and secured details of his social media accounts for forensic analysis. Officials confirmed that initial investigations have established a prima facie case under Sections 66F (cyberterrorism) and 84C of the Information Technology (IT) Act.
Legal Challenges and Defense
The legal proceedings took a procedural turn when Handoo’s defense team, led by Advocate Aazim Ahmad Pandit, initially approached a magistrate for bail. Upon realizing that the police had invoked Section 66F of the IT Act—a provision that falls under the purview of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act—the defense retracted the application, noting that the matter must be heard by a specialized court.
“My client has been accused of sharing information on eight separate occasions,” said Aazim Ahmad Pandit. “We maintain that the case as presented does not satisfy the legal thresholds required to constitute an act of cyberterrorism. We intend to approach the competent court to seek relief.”
Context of the Crackdown
The arrest occurs against a backdrop of heightened anxiety within the Valley. Earlier this year, in August, a series of anonymous threat letters surfaced online, specifically targeting members of the Kashmiri Pandit community. These documents often included the names and contact details of individuals, leading to significant alarm.
In response to these developments, authorities tightened security protocols in areas housing migrant employees and permitted several staff members under the PM’s package to work from home as a precautionary measure. Organizations like Panun Kashmir had publicly voiced grave concerns over these threats, demanding that the administration ensure the safety of those named in the circulating digital literature.
As the police await detailed reports from the Forensic Science Laboratory, the case highlights the growing challenges faced by law enforcement in monitoring digital spaces to prevent the weaponization of social media in conflict-sensitive regions.
Disclaimer: This content is auto-generated for informational purposes only.
Source: Read Original News
