India Dismisses Frivolous US Lawsuit Filed by Khalistani Terrorist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun
New Delhi: The Indian government has issued a sharp rebuttal to a civil lawsuit filed in a United States court by designated Khalistani terrorist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun. New Delhi has categorically rejected the allegations leveled against National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval and former Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW) chief Samant Goel, labeling the legal action as both “fabricated and malicious.”
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) characterized the entire legal proceeding as frivolous, asserting that such attempts to malign senior Indian officials hold no merit. The confrontation follows a move by the US State Department to formally transmit court-issued summonses to the Indian government through established diplomatic channels.
Formal Diplomatic Communication
According to reports, the US State Department facilitated the delivery of the documents to the Indian Embassy in Washington, DC, on October 9. This action followed a diplomatic note signed in late September. In their official correspondence, US authorities cited the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA)—a critical piece of US legislation that delineates the parameters under which foreign officials and state-linked entities can be subjected to legal proceedings within the American judicial system.
Despite the formality of the delivery, the US State Department clarified that its involvement was purely procedural. The note stated that the Department maintained “no discretion” in carrying out the request from the District Court, as mandated by the FSIA.
India’s Stance on Procedural Integrity
External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal addressed the matter during a press briefing, emphasizing that India remains unfazed by the allegations. He underscored that any formal request to serve judicial documents within Indian territory must adhere to strict protocols.
“We reject the fabricated and malicious attacks on our high officials. Also, we reject the frivolous lawsuits,” Jaiswal stated. He further clarified that any international legal request must be routed exclusively through India’s designated central authority, which is the Ministry of Law and Justice. By failing to follow this established channel, the current legal maneuver is being viewed by New Delhi as an improperly executed attempt to politicize the judicial process.
Background of the Dispute
The civil lawsuit was initiated by Pannun, who acts as the legal counsel for “Sikhs for Justice” (SFJ), an extremist separatist organization that has been officially banned by the Indian government due to its involvement in inciting violence and promoting secessionist activities. Pannun, who is currently a wanted fugitive in India facing multiple terrorism-related charges, is seeking damages for an alleged, unproven plot to assassinate him on American soil.
The civil case is being viewed by observers as a continuation of tensions arising from a separate, ongoing criminal investigation. In November 2023, US prosecutors charged an Indian national, Nikhil Gupta, with allegedly conspiring with an unnamed Indian government employee to orchestrate an assassination attempt against Pannun. While that criminal investigation remains separate from the civil lawsuit, both matters concern the same set of allegations regarding a thwarted plot in New York.
As the legal saga continues, New Delhi remains firm in its position that the claims are a strategic attempt to tarnish the reputation of India’s security leadership while shielding a known extremist from his own legal repercussions in India.
Disclaimer: This content is auto-generated for informational purposes only.
Source: Read Original News
