GB News Exposes "Migrant Toolkit" Recommended by Local Authorities, Sparking Outrage
London, UK – GB News delivered a bombshell report tonight, revealing that several UK public bodies are allegedly recommending an online "migrant toolkit" to individuals seeking to enter Britain, with critics claiming it facilitates illegal immigration and undermines national border controls. The breaking news update, presented by Martin Daubney, unveiled a resource titled "Right to Remain," purportedly endorsed by the Greater London Authority, Ealing Council, and Hertfordshire County Council.
Daubney opened the segment with a dramatic announcement: "Breaking news. Tonight we can reveal that public bodies are recommending a pro-open borders UK migrant and NGOs online toolkit for illegal immigrants to help get their asylum claims accepted." The presenter asserted that GB News’ exclusive investigation uncovered the toolkit’s presence on these council websites.
The "Right to Remain" toolkit, as showcased on screen, offers comprehensive explanations of the asylum system. However, what has drawn particular condemnation from GB News and its viewers is its alleged guidance on navigating the appeals process if an asylum claim is initially rejected. Footage shown to viewers included a female voice explaining, "Most people who claim asylum have a right to appeal. In the court, you will argue that the Home Office was wrong to refuse your asylum claim and that you should be granted protection in the UK."
Further revelations highlighted that the toolkit is available in multiple languages, catering to migrants who may not speak English. Daubney initially acknowledged that some might view this as an "innocent educational tool," but quickly pivoted to present further findings.
The "Right to Remain" website itself states that "Migrants are faced with a hostile environment, denying them basic rights and major obstacles to establishing their legal right to remain." GB News further revealed the toolkit’s connection to a grassroots campaign called "These Walls Must Fall," which, according to Daubney, "claims on its website that the border enforcement regime is a racist system." The presenter also noted the substantial reach of these services, claiming they have been utilized by a staggering 320,000 individuals.
Concluding his report, Daubney painted a stark picture, describing the situation as "the latest edition of the dark underbelly of the migrant crisis." He accused "radical, left-wing charities and NGOs whose sole mission is to campaign for a world in which no one is considered illegal" of "providing a route into the country to hundreds of thousands of people from all around the world." The most damning assertion, in Daubney’s view, was that this alleged facilitation was "being recommended by your local authorities."
The report immediately ignited a firestorm of outrage among GB News viewers. Social media was flooded with reactions, with one viewer expressing their frustration by writing: "These charities and NGOs need to be held to account for facilitating illegal immigration." Another demanded severe repercussions, stating, "Those involved should be prosecuted and jailed." A third viewer articulated a common sentiment, asserting, "So they’re aiding and abetting these people committing the criminal act of breaking in to our country," while a fourth echoed calls for decisive action: "Shut them down, deport or arrest."
The GB News expose has undoubtedly sparked a contentious debate about the role of local authorities, charities, and NGOs in the ongoing migrant crisis, and is expected to generate further discussion and scrutiny in the coming days.
