TURMOIL has engulfed the Boxing Federation of India (BFI) this week, as a high-stakes administrative clash reached a breaking point. In a decisive move that has sent shockwaves through the national sporting fraternity, BFI president Ajay Singh officially suspended secretary general Pramod Kumar, citing a litany of charges ranging from severe financial irregularities to the unauthorized exercise of administrative power.
The suspension, issued by Singh on Tuesday, comes amidst a backdrop of escalating internal conflict. As it stands, Kumar is barred from performing any duties associated with his role as secretary general, effectively sidelining a key figurehead during one of the most volatile periods in the BFI’s recent history.
Financial Impropriety and the Pinnacle Broadcast Dispute
At the heart of the disciplinary action lies a tangled financial dispute involving a work order for broadcasting arrangements during the World Boxing Finals Cup, held in Greater Noida in November 2025.
According to the suspension order, discrepancies regarding a contract with Pinnacle Broadcast Productions have raised serious alarms. Kumar had previously presented documentation to the federation suggesting that Pinnacle had committed to providing Rs 2 crore in sponsorship and broadcasting support for the event. However, the company has since categorically denied making any such commitment.
The federation’s investigation found that, contrary to established protocols, a work order for approximately Rs 1.5 crore was issued to Pinnacle by Kumar without the mandatory approval of the BFI finance committee. The suspension order highlights that this divergence between the reported sponsorship and the actual financial claims against the federation points to a “serious doubt” regarding the authenticity of the documents represented by the secretary general.
The Nahan Championship Controversy
Financial mismanagement is not the only hurdle Kumar faces. The federation’s leadership has also launched a scathing critique of his handling of the ill-fated BFI Elite Men and Women Open Boxing Championship, which was scheduled for August 16–23 in Nahan, Himachal Pradesh.
The abrupt, last-minute cancellation of the tournament sparked immediate backlash, leading to the formation of an inquiry committee on August 17. The suspension order alleges that rather than assisting in the transparency of the event’s cancellation, Kumar actively obstructed the process. He is accused of repeatedly stalling for time and failing to provide substantive responses to the committee’s inquiries, effectively stonewalling the federation’s efforts to determine why such a significant national event was dismantled on the eve of competition.
Power Struggle and the “No-Confidence” Gambit
The timing of this suspension is particularly contentious. Just 24 hours prior to his removal, Kumar had escalated his standoff with the BFI top brass by writing directly to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In his letter, Kumar alleged that he was being subjected to “criminal intimidation” by both President Ajay Singh and Executive Director Col. Arun Malik. Specifically, Kumar claimed that these senior officials were working to block a proposed no-confidence motion that he intended to bring against Singh.
Col. Malik has dismissed these claims as entirely “baseless.”
The BFI administration views Kumar’s recent moves as a direct violation of the federation’s constitution. Last week, Kumar attempted to unilaterally call a Special General Meeting (SGM) for October 28, claiming he had gathered the support of a majority of state units to oust Singh. The suspension order, however, contends that Kumar lacks the constitutional authority to issue such notices or convene meetings of that nature without the express approval of the federation.
Furthermore, the BFI leadership has accused Kumar of attempting to seize administrative control by instructing federation staff and officials to disregard the authority of the president. The order states: “You have also issued communications to the officials and staff of BFI instigating them to disregard the authority of the President… and claiming to be at the helm of the administration.”
The Path Forward for BFI
The suspension order remains an interim measure, with the BFI emphasizing that it is “pending completion of the inquiry” and “shall not be construed as a final determination of the allegations.” Nevertheless, the terms are strict: Kumar is prohibited from accessing official records, issuing communications on behalf of the BFI, or interfering with the ongoing investigation.
The warning issued to Kumar is unequivocal—any attempt to bypass these restrictions or obstruct the federation’s proceedings will be treated with the utmost severity and could lead to further, more permanent disciplinary measures in accordance with the BFI Constitution.
For now, the boxing community is left to watch closely as the BFI navigates this administrative crisis. With major events looming and the governance structure in flux, the federation faces a critical period of internal stabilization to ensure that the sport—and its athletes—do not suffer as a result of the ongoing power struggle at the top.
Disclaimer: This content is auto-generated for informational purposes only.
Source: Read Original News
