Trot singer Sukhaeng has been dealt a legal blow following the conclusion of the first-instance trial regarding a year-long controversy over her alleged affair with a married man.
The Seongnam Branch of the Suwon District Court’s Civil Division 7 issued its ruling on September 17, finding partially in favor of the plaintiff—the wife of the man involved in the infidelity scandal.
The litigation began after the plaintiff, identified as “A,” publicly accused the singer on the December 29, 2025, broadcast of JTBC’s Case Master. A alleged that her husband had engaged in an affair with Sukhaeng, abandoned their family home, and subsequently began cohabiting with the performer. To support these claims, the program aired CCTV footage showing a woman appearing to be Sukhaeng in intimate physical contact with the man, including hugging and kissing.
Following the initial filing of the complaint in September 2025, Sukhaeng remained silent for over three months. The case saw significant delays; when the court signaled it would issue a judgment without further oral arguments, the singer abruptly retained legal counsel and submitted a power of attorney. This prompted the court to cancel the original judgment session and proceed with three rounds of formal arguments, finally concluding the trial on the 20th.
During the height of the controversy, the plaintiff claimed she had reached out to Sukhaeng, only to be told by the singer to stop contacting her. Sukhaeng had initially defended her position, stating she believed the man’s marriage had already effectively ended and that he intended to marry her once legal matters were settled. Upon realizing the divorce was not finalized, she claimed to have ended the relationship. In a tearful appeal, the singer previously expressed distress over her career, stating, “I am a victim,” and emphasizing her need to support her parents. She later withdrew from the variety show she was participating in at the time.
In contrast, the man involved, identified as “B,” attempted to shoulder the responsibility. Through the YouTube channel Entertainment Backstabber Lee Jin-ho, he claimed that he had convinced Sukhaeng they were separated and that their relationship was on the path to divorce. He stated, “I wish Sukhaeng would shift all responsibility to me. It pains me to think how much she is hurting.”
Despite these defensive claims, the court’s ruling marks a significant development in a case that has dominated headlines and impacted the singer’s professional standing. As of now, the specifics regarding the financial or compensatory requirements of the ruling have not been fully disclosed, but the court’s decision establishes legal culpability in the affair.
Disclaimer: This content is auto-generated for informational purposes only.
Source: Read Original News
