CJI Surya Kant Intervenes to Secure Release of Lawyers Detained Near Supreme Court
In a swift judicial intervention on Saturday morning, Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant facilitated the release of several lawyers who had been detained by Delhi Police while participating in a peaceful protest near the Supreme Court complex. The incident occurred amidst a climate of heightened security and widespread movement restrictions across the national capital, imposed ahead of a demonstration organized by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP).
Urgent Intervention by the Bar and Judiciary
The detention of several prominent legal professionals, including senior advocates Uttar Babbar and PV Dinesh, along with counsels Anne Methew, KR Subhash Chandran, and Sunita Hazarika, sparked immediate backlash from the legal fraternity. According to the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), the lawyers were picked up near the court vicinity and transported to the Yamuna Sports Complex.
SCBA president Pradeep Rai sounded the alarm on social media, labeling the detention of officers of the court from their own professional chambers as “deeply disturbing.” Following urgent representations from the Bar leadership, the CJI personally contacted government authorities to demand the immediate release of the detainees. The administrative machinery responded promptly, and within minutes, the CJI was informed that the lawyers had been released. Rai later expressed his gratitude to the CJI while emphasizing that the professional independence and safety of the Bar must remain a priority for law enforcement.
Judicial Scrutiny of Security Measures
The tensions on Saturday followed a significant judicial observation made by a Supreme Court bench headed by CJI Surya Kant only a day earlier. On Friday, the bench—comprising the CJI and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana—had sharply criticized the Delhi government and police for implementing blanket shutdowns of public transport services in response to the planned CJP demonstration.
The authorities had initially planned to close entry and exit points at 57 metro stations, truncate train operations, and cancel various railway services. During the hearing, the bench remarked that while security regulation is necessary, the administration cannot use a “hammer to kill a fly.” The court emphasized that authorities must distinguish between regulating public order and imposing an outright halt on the city’s life, which causes undue hardship to citizens commuting for work or education.
“Stopping something and regulating are two different concepts,” the bench stated, directing authorities to ensure that public safety measures remain proportionate. Following these observations, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, agreed to reconsider the intensity of the restrictions.
Atmosphere of Heightened Security
Saturday’s detentions unfolded against the backdrop of a heavy security deployment across Delhi. Police had previously denied the CJP permission to hold their rally at Jantar Mantar, citing security concerns. Consequently, the city witnessed massive barricading and the deployment of central armed police forces to prevent protesters from gathering.
Beyond the metro and railway restrictions, the legal community had also raised concerns on Friday regarding reports of police personnel canvassing hostels and private accommodations to dissuade young individuals from joining the protest. While the bench declined to formally rule on those allegations without substantiated evidence, the quick resolution of the lawyers’ detention has once again highlighted the delicate balance between maintaining public order and upholding the fundamental right to protest in the national capital.
Disclaimer: This content is auto-generated for informational purposes only.
Source: Read Original News
