Extreme droughts shrink suitable habitats and reduce fitness for large mammals in the American West


  • Pokhrel, Y. et al. Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 226–233 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Seager, R. et al. Projections of declining surface-water availability for the southwestern United States. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 482–486 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Yuan, X. et al. A global transition to flash droughts under climate change. Science 380, 187–191 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van den Bosch, M., Costanza, J. K., Peek, R. A., Mola, J. M. & Steel, Z. L. Climate change scenarios forecast increased drought exposure for terrestrial vertebrates in the contiguous United States. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 1–9 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Brookshire, E. N. J. & Weaver, T. Long-term decline in grassland productivity driven by increasing dryness. Nat. Commun. 6, 7148 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, T., Werf, G. R., Jeu, R.aM., Wang, G. & Dolman, A. J. A global analysis of the impact of drought on net primary productivity. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 3885–3894 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lei, T. et al. Net Primary Productivity Loss under different drought levels in different grassland ecosystems. J. Environ. Manag. 274, 111144 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohlert, T. et al. Drought intensity and duration interact to magnify losses in primary productivity. Science 390, 284–289 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Breshears, D. D. et al. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 15144–15148 (2005).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fellows, A. W. & Goulden, M. L. Rapid vegetation redistribution in Southern California during the early 2000s drought. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 117, G03025 (2012).

  • Martínez-Vilalta, J. & Lloret, F. Drought-induced vegetation shifts in terrestrial ecosystems: the key role of regeneration dynamics. Glob. Planet. Change 144, 94–108 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peñuelas, J. et al. Response of plant species richness and primary productivity in shrublands along a north–south gradient in Europe to seven years of experimental warming and drought: reductions in primary productivity in the heat and drought year of 2003. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2563–2581 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Prugh, L. R. et al. Ecological winners and losers of extreme drought in California. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 819–824 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Spooner, F. E. B., Pearson, R. G. & Freeman, R. Rapid warming is associated with population decline among terrestrial birds and mammals globally. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4521–4531 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rubenstein, M. A. et al. Climate change and the global redistribution of biodiversity: substantial variation in empirical support for expected range shifts. Environ. Evid. 12, 7 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buzhdygan, O. Y. et al. Biodiversity increases multitrophic energy use efficiency, flow and storage in grasslands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 393–405 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lindeman, R. L. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23, 399–417 (1942).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hatton, I. A. et al. The predator-prey power law: biomass scaling across terrestrial and aquatic biomes. Science 349, aac6284 (2015).

  • Stoner, D. C. et al. Climatically driven changes in primary production propagate through trophic levels. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4453–4463 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Duncan, C., Chauvenet, A. L. M., McRae, L. M. & Pettorelli, N. Predicting the future impact of droughts on ungulate populations in arid and semi-arid environments. PLoS ONE 7, e51490 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pyke, G. H. Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 523–575 (1984).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ferreira, S. M. & Viljoen, P. African large carnivore population changes in response to a drought. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 52, 1–11 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gedir, J. V., Cain III, J. W., Swetnam, T. L., Krausman, P. R. & Morgart, J. R. Extreme drought and adaptive resource selection by a desert mammal. Ecosphere 11, e03175 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pierce, B. M., Bleich, V. C., Monteith, K. L. & Bowyer, R. T. Top-down versus bottom-up forcing: evidence from mountain lions and mule deer. J. Mammal. 93, 977–988 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Holt, R. D. Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 19659–19665 (2009).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pulliam, H. r. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecol. Lett. 3, 349–361 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hirzel, A. H. & Le Lay, G. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1372–1381 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Matthiopoulos, J. Defining, estimating, and understanding the fundamental niches of complex animals in heterogeneous environments. Ecol. Monogr. 92, e1545 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moore, H. A., Dunlop, J. A. & Nimmo, D. G. Habitat suitability correlates with mean population fitness of a threatened marsupial predator. Wildl. Res. 51, WR23023 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rittenhouse, C. D., Thompson Iii, F. R., Dijak, W. D., Millspaugh, J. J. & Clawson, R. L. Evaluation of habitat suitability models for forest passerines using demographic data. J. Wildl. Manag. 74, 411–422 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Diffenbaugh, N. S., Swain, D. L. & Touma, D. Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3931–3936 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Overpeck, J. T. & Udall, B. Climate change and the aridification of North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11856–11858 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368, 314–318 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pierce, B. M., Bleich, V. C. & Terry Bowyer, R. Selection of mule deer by mountain lions and coyotes: Effects of hunting style, body size, and reproductive status. J. Mammal. 81, 462–472 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Huang, L. et al. Drought dominates the interannual variability in global terrestrial net primary production by controlling semi-arid ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 6, 24639 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Peng, D. et al. Country-level net primary production distribution and response to drought and land cover change. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 65–77 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zhao, M. & Running, S. W. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science 329, 940–943 (2010).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Smith, M. D. et al. Extreme drought impacts have been underestimated in grasslands and shrublands globally. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2309881120 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bose, S., Forrester, T. D., Casady, D. S. & Wittmer, H. U. Effect of activity states on habitat selection by black-tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manag. 82, 1711–1724 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Morano, S., Stewart, K. M., Dilts, T., Ellsworth, A. & Bleich, V. C. Resource selection of mule deer in a shrub-steppe ecosystem: influence of woodland distribution and animal behavior. Ecosphere 10, e02811 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ballard, W. B., Lutz, D., Keegan, T. W., Carpenter, L. H. & deVos, J. C. Deer-predator relationships: a review of recent North American studies with emphasis on mule and black-tailed deer. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 29, 99–115 (2001).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Parker, K. L., Barboza, P. S. & Gillingham, M. P. Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates. Funct. Ecol. 23, 57–69 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ciuti, S., Jensen, W. F., Nielsen, S. E. & Boyce, M. S. Predicting mule deer recruitment from climate oscillations for harvest management on the northern Great Plains. J. Wildl. Manag. 79, 1226–1238 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hurley, M. A. et al. Demographic response of mule deer to experimental reduction of coyotes and mountain lions in southeastern Idaho. Wildl. Monogr. 178, 1–33 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Murphy, K. J. et al. Mule deer fawn recruitment dynamics in an energy disturbed landscape. Ecol. Evol. 13, e9976 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wato, Y. A. et al. Prolonged drought results in starvation of African elephant (Loxodonta africana). Biol. Conserv. 203, 89–96 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lomas, L. A. & Bender, L. C. Survival and cause-specific mortality of neonatal mule deer fawns, north-central New Mexico. J. Wildl. Manag. 71, 884–894 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Matthiopoulos, J. et al. Establishing the link between habitat selection and animal population dynamics. Ecol. Monogr. 85, 413–436 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Messmer, T. A., Arnett, E. B., Belinda, S. R., Mayer, K. E. & Southwick, R. Human dimensions. in Ecology and Management of Black-tailed and Mule Deer of North America 321–330 (CRC Press, 2023).

  • Pierce, B. M. & Bleich, V. C. Mountain lion. in Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation 744–757 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).

  • Knopff, K. H., Knopff, A. A., Kortello, A. & Boyce, M. S. Cougar kill rate and prey composition in a multiprey system. J. Wildl. Manag 74, 1435–1447 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Forrester, T. D. & Wittmer, H. U. Predator identity and forage availability affect predation risk of juvenile black-tailed deer. Wildl. Biol. 2019, wlb.00510 (2019).

  • Monteith, K. L. et al. Life-history characteristics of mule deer: effects of nutrition in a variable environment: nutrition and life history of mule deer. Wild. Mon. 186, 1–62 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Elbroch, L. M., Lendrum, P. E., Allen, M. L. & Wittmer, H. U. Nowhere to hide: Pumas, black bears, and competition refuges. Behav. Ecol. 26, 247–254 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cardillo, M. et al. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science 309, 1239–1241 (2005).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Beckmann, J. P. & Berger, J. Rapid ecological and behavioural changes in carnivores: the responses of black bears (Ursus americanus) to altered food. J. Zool. 261, 207–212 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Abrahms, B. et al. Climate change as a global amplifier of human–wildlife conflict. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 224–234 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lendrum, P. E., Anderson, C. R. Jr., Long, R. A., Kie, J. G. & Bowyer, R. T. Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural-gas development. Ecosphere 3, art82 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dellinger, J. A. et al. Using mountain lion habitat selection in management. J. Wildl. Manag. 84, 359–371 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sultaire, S. M. et al. Black bear density and habitat use variation at the Sierra Nevada-Great Basin Desert transition. J. Wildl. Manag. 87, e22358 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leclerc, M. et al. Acute drought desiccates highly used habitat and drives herbivores into irrigated croplands. Ecol. Appl. 35, e70126 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ditmer, M. A. et al. Predicting dispersal and conflict risk for wolf recolonization in Colorado. J. Appl. Ecol. 60, 2327–2339 (2023).

  • Frank, K. M. et al. Dark roads aid movement but increase mortality of a generalist herbivore in the American Southwest. Ecosphere 14, e4508 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnson, H. E. et al. Evaluating apparent competition in limiting the recovery of an endangered ungulate. Oecologia 171, 295–307 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Van de Kerk, M., McMillan, B. R., Hersey, K. R., Roug, A. & Larsen, R. T. Effect of net-gun capture on survival of mule deer. J. Wildl. Manag. 84, 813–820 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kirkland, G. L. Jr. Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. J. Mammal. 79, 1416–1431 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Keating, K. A. & Cherry, S. Modeling utilization distributions in space and time. Ecology 90, 1971–1980 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Signer, J., Fieberg, J. & Avgar, T. Animal movement tools (amt): R package for managing tracking data and conducting habitat selection analyses. Ecol. Evol. 9, 880–890 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Northrup, J. M., Hooten, M. B., Anderson, C. R. Jr. & Wittemyer, G. Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use–availability design. Ecology 94, 1456–1463 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bernales, H. H. Development of an Innovative Statewide Population Monitoring Program for Mule Deer (Utah State University, 2010).

  • Stoner, D. C., Sexton, J. O., Nagol, J., Bernales, H. H. & Edwards, T. C. Ungulate reproductive parameters track satellite observations of plant phenology across latitude and climatological regimes. PLoS ONE 11, e0148780 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hijmans, R. J. Terra: Spatial Data Analysis. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra (2024).

  • Dewitz, J. National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2019 Products (ver. 3.0, February 2024). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KZCM54 (2021).

  • Prokhorenkova, L. et al. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Bengio, S. et al.) Vol. 31 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2018).

  • Dubayah, R. O. et al. GEDI L4A Footprint Level Aboveground Biomass Density, Version 1.MB ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1907 (2021).

  • Sexton, J. O. et al. Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: Landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar-based estimates of error. Int. J. Digital Earth 6, 427–448 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • U.S. Geological Survey. USGS National Transportation Dataset (NTD) Downloadable Data Collection. U.S. Geological Survey, National Geospatial Technical Operations Center. https://data.usgs.gov/datacatalog/data/USGS:ad3d631d-f51f-4b6a-91a3-e617d6a58b4e (2017).

  • Fieberg, J., Signer, J., Smith, B. & Avgar, T. A ‘How to’ guide for interpreting parameters in habitat-selection analyses. J. Anim. Ecol. 90, 1027–1043 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Northrup, J. M. et al. Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution. Ecol. Appl. 32, e02470 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Graham, M. H. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84, 2809–2815 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Helwig, N. E. nptest: Nonparametric Bootstrap and Permutation Tests. 1.1 https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.nptest (2019).

  • Johnson, C. J., Nielsen, S. E., Merrill, E. H., Mcdonald, T. L. & Boyce, M. S. Resource selection functions based on use–availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods. J. Wildl. Manag. 70, 347–357 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • R. Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2024).

  • Leclerc, M. & Mills, K. L. Replication data for: extreme droughts shrink suitable habitats and reduce fitness for large mammals in the American West. Boréalis. https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/FSYE1M (2026).



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *